Exploring Factors Influencing ChatGPT-Supported Critical Thinking Skill Cultivation in English-as-a-Foreign-Language Classrooms

Main Article Content

Weijun Liang
Yanjun Wu

Abstract

In the artificial intelligence (AI) era, critical thinking encompasses the capacity to scrutinise data, assess diverse viewpoints, and construct logical arguments, all within the context of AI-driven platforms. This competency is becoming increasingly important as AI technology becomes more pervasive in various spheres of life and work. The wide application of ChatGPT, a state-of-the-art AI chatbot, has given rise to heated discussions on its effect on students’ critical thinking. However, little is known about the factors influencing ChatGPT-supported critical thinking skill cultivation. To fill this research gap, the present study aims to explore the factors influencing a teaching programme designed to leverage ChatGPT for critical thinking skill cultivation among English-as-a-foreign-language (EFL) learners at a university in Macau. Based on thematic analysis of 55 student reflection journals, along with the teaching materials used in the teaching programme, this study identified four factors: the ChatGPT-supported critical thinking activity, the reading topic, the SMART group discussion, and the way of posing questions to ChatGPT. The findings shed light on the refinement of the framework for fostering critical thinking through educational technology. They also yielded significant implications for the instruction of critical thinking skills and for future research directions.

Article Details

Section

Educational Technology

References

Abbas, M., Jam, F. A., & Khan, T. I. (2024). Is it harmful or helpful? Examining the causes and consequences of generative AI usage among university students. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21(1), 10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00444-7

Anggraeni, D. M., Prahani, B. K., Suprapto, N., Shofiyah, N., & Jatmiko, B. (2023). Systematic review of problem based learning research in fostering critical thinking skills. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 49, 101334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2023.101334

Bolton, G., & Delderfield, R. (2018). Reflective practice: Writing and professional development (5th ed.). SAGE Publications Ltd.

Chan, C. K. Y., & Hu, W. (2023). Students’ voices on generative AI: Perceptions, benefits, and challenges in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1), 43. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00411-8

Chan, C. K. Y., & Lee, K. K. W. (2023). The AI generation gap: Are Gen Z students more interested in adopting generative AI such as ChatGPT in teaching and learning than their Gen X and millennial generation teachers? Smart Learning Environments, 10(1), 60. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00269-3

Chang, J. L., Hung, H. T., & Yang, Y. T. C. (2024). Effects of an annotation‐supported Socratic questioning approach on students’ argumentative writing performance and critical thinking skills in flipped language classrooms. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 40(1), 37–48. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12856

Chen, B., Zhu, X., & Díaz del Castillo H, F. (2023). Integrating generative AI in knowledge building. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 5, 100184. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100184

Dai, Y., Lai, S., Lim, C. P., & Liu, A. (2023). ChatGPT and its impact on research supervision: Insights from Australian postgraduate research students. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 39(4), 74–88. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.8843

Falloon, G. (2024). Investigating pedagogical, technological and school factors underpinning effective ‘critical thinking curricula’ in K-6 education. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 51, 101447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2023.101447

Farrokhnia, M., Banihashem, S. K., Noroozi, O., & Wals, A. (2024). A SWOT analysis of ChatGPT: Implications for educational practice and research. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 61(3), 460–474. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2023.2195846

Guo, Y., & Lee, D. (2023). Leveraging ChatGPT for enhancing critical thinking skills. Journal of Chemical Education, 100(12), 4876–4883. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.3c00505

Halpern, D. F. (1998). Teaching critical thinking for transfer across domains: Disposition, skills, structure training, and metacognitive monitoring. American Psychologist, 53(4), 449–455. https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066x.53.4.449

Holma, K. (2015). The critical spirit: Emotional and moral dimensions of critical thinking. Studier i Pædagogisk Filosofi, 4, 17–28. https://doi.org/10.7146/spf.v4i1.18280

Jiang, X., Li, J., & Chen, C.-H. (2024). Enhancing critical thinking skills with ChatGPT-powered activities in Chinese language classrooms. International Journal of Chinese Language Teaching, 5(1), 47–73. https://doi.org/10.46451/ijclt.20240105

Kuhn, D. (1991). The skills of argument. Cambridge University Press.

Labadze, L., Grigolia, M., & Machaidze, L. (2023). Role of AI chatbots in education: Systematic literature review. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1), 56. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00426-1

Lai, E. R. (2011). Critical thinking: A literature review. Pearson’s Research Reports, 6(1), 40–41.

Larson, R. B. (2019). Controlling social desirability bias. International Journal of Market Research, 61(5), 534–547. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470785318805305

Lee, H.-Y., Chen, P.-H., Wang, W.-S., Huang, Y.-M., & Wu, T.-T. (2024). Empowering ChatGPT with guidance mechanism in blended learning: Effect of self-regulated learning, higher-order thinking skills, and knowledge construction. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21(1), 16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00447-4

Lee, K. (2007). Online collaborative case study learning. Journal of College Reading and Learning, 37(2), 82–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/10790195.2007.10850199

Li, Y., & Liu, X. (2024). Foucauldian critical thinking: An antithesis to technicization. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 58(6), 910–928. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopedu/qhae058

Liang, W. (2023). Towards a set of design principles for technology-assisted critical-thinking cultivation: A synthesis of research in English language education. Thinking Skills and Creativity. 47, 101203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101203

Liang, W., & Wu, Y. (2024). Exploring the use of ChatGPT to foster EFL learners’ critical thinking skills from a post-humanist perspective. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 54, 101645. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101645

Liu, O. L., Frankel, L., & Roohr, K. C. (2014). Assessing critical thinking in higher education: Current state and directions for next‐generation assessment. ETS Research Report Series, 2014(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1002/ets2.12009

Lo, C. K., Hew, K. F., & Jong, M. S.-y. (2024). The influence of ChatGPT on student engagement: A systematic review and future research agenda. Computers & Education, 105100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105100

McPeck, J. E. ( 1981). Critical thinking and education. Robertson.

Nguyen, T. T. H. (2023). EFL teachers’ perspectives toward the use of ChatGPT in writing classes: A case study at Van Lang University. International Journal of Language Instruction, 2(3), 1–47. https://doi.org/10.54855/ijli.23231

Paulsen, V. H., & Kolstø, S. D. (2022). Students’ reasoning when faced with test items of challenging aspects of critical thinking. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 43, 100969. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100969

Pettersson, H. (2023). From critical thinking to criticality and back again. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 57(2), 478–494. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopedu/qhad021

Qawqzeh, Y. (2024). Exploring the influence of student interaction with ChatGPT on critical thinking, problem solving, and creativity. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 14(4). 596–601. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2024.14.4.2082

Shahzad, M. F., Xu, S., & Javed, I. (2024). ChatGPT awareness, acceptance, and adoption in higher education: The role of trust as a cornerstone. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21(1), 46. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00478-x

Terry, G., Hayfield, N., Clarke, V., & Braun, V. (2017). Thematic analysis. In C. Willig & W. Rogers (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research in psychology (pp. 17–37). Sage.

Wale, B. D., & Bishaw, K. S. (2020). Effects of using inquiry-based learning on EFL students’ critical thinking skills. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 5, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-020-00090-2

Walter, Y. (2024). Embracing the future of Artificial Intelligence in the classroom: The relevance of AI literacy, prompt engineering, and critical thinking in modern education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21(1), 15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00448-3

Willingham, D. T. (2008). Critical thinking: Why is it so hard to teach? Arts Education Policy Review, 109(4), 21–32, https://doi.org/10.3200/AEPR.109.4.21-32

Xia, Q., Weng, X., Ouyang, F., Lin, T. J., & Chiu, T. K. F. (2024). A scoping review on how generative artificial intelligence transforms assessment in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21(1), 40. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00468-z

Yuan, R., Liao, W., Wang, Z., Kong, J., & Zhang, Y. (2022). How do English-as-a-foreign-language (EFL) teachers perceive and engage with critical thinking: A systematic review from 2010 to 2020. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 43, 101002. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101002

Zhang, H., & Yuan, R. (2024). Rethinking the infusion approach to teaching critical thinking in reading in Chinese tertiary English classes. RELC Journal, 55(2), 364–378. https://doi.org/10.1177/00336882221087466

Zhang, P., & Tur, G. (2024). A systematic review of ChatGPT use in K‐12 education. European Journal of Education, 59, e12599. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12599

Zhao, C., Pandian, A., & Singh, M. K. M. (2016). Instructional strategies for developing critical thinking in EFL classrooms. English Language Teaching, 9(10), 14–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/elt.v9n10p14

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.