An Integrated TAM–UTAUT–ECM Model for Understanding User Willingness and Satisfaction with Digital Teaching Platforms in Chinese Applied Universities

Main Article Content

Fan Zhang

Abstract

This study developed and validated an integrated framework combining the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT), and Expectation–Confirmation Model (ECM) to examine user willingness and satisfaction with digital teaching platforms in Chinese applied universities. Survey data from 405 faculty and students were analyzed using partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) to assess direct, indirect, and mediating relationships. Findings showed that perceived usefulness, effort expectancy, and satisfaction were the most significant predictors of user willingness and continuance intention, while behavioral intention had limited explanatory power. Satisfaction emerged as a key mediator, highlighting the role of emotional evaluation in sustaining engagement. The model showed strong predictive capacity, with R² values exceeding 0.60. Practical implications include improving platform usability through targeted training, incorporating emotionally intuitive design features, and establishing feedback-driven interface enhancements to support long-term adoption in applied university settings.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Section

Educational Management

References

Adeshola, I., & Agoyi, M. (2022). Examining factors influencing e-learning engagement among university students during covid-19 pandemic: a mediating role of “learning persistence.” Interactive Learning Environments, 31(10), 6195–6222. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2022.2029493

Al-Emran, M., Mezhuyev, V., & Kamaludin, A. (2018). Technology Acceptance Model in M-learning context: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 125, 389-412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.06.008

Alkhuwaylidee, A. R. (2025). Exploring Factors Influencing Students’ Continuance Intention to Use E-Learning System for Iraqi University Students. Computers, 14(5), 176. https://doi.org/10.3390/computers14050176

Alshammari, S. H., & Alshammari, R. A. (2024). Modelling the effects of self-regulation, perceived usefulness, and satisfaction on continuous intention: Extending expectation–confirmation model in the m-learning context. Frontiers in Education, 9, 1506185. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1506185

Alshammari, S. H., & Babu, E. (2025). The mediating role of satisfaction in the relationship between perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and students’ behavioral intention to use ChatGPT. Scientific Reports, 15, Article 7169. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-91634-4

Bhattacherjee, A. (2001). Understanding information systems continuance: An expectation-confirmation model. MIS Quarterly, 25(3), 351–370. https://doi.org/10.2307/3250921

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008

Deng, P., Chen, B., & Wang, L. (2023). Predicting students’ continued intention to use E-learning platform for college English study: The mediating effect of E-satisfaction and habit. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1182980. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1182980

Gao, B. (2023). A uses and gratifications approach to examining users’ continuance intention towards smart mobile learning. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-02239-z

Guenther, P., Guenther, M., Ringle, C. M., Zaefarian, G., & Cartwright, S. (2025). PLS-SEM and reflective constructs: A response to recent criticism and a constructive path forward. Industrial Marketing Management, 128, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2025.05.003

Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2021a). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M. (2019a). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C., Sarstedt, M., & Danks, N. P. (2021b). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) using R: A workbook. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80519-7

Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019b). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203

Hair, J., & Alamer, A. (2022). Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (Pls-Sem) in Second Language and Education Research: Guidelines Using an Applied Example. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 1(3), 100027. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmal.2022.100027

Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8

Hwang, G., Lai, C., & Wang, S. (2015). Seamless flipped learning: a mobile technology-enhanced flipped classroom with effective learning strategies. Journal of Computers in Education, 2(4), 449–473. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-015-0043-0

Kahnbach, L., Hase, A., Kuhl, P., & Lehr, D. (2024). Explaining primary school teachers’ intention to use digital learning platforms for students’ individualized practice: Comparison of the standard UTAUT and an extended model. Frontiers in Education, 9, 1353020. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1353020

Li, L. (2022). Continuance intention of university students and online learning during the COVID‑19 pandemic: A modified expectation‑confirmation model perspective. Frontiers in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1046407

Sarstedt, M., Hair, J. F., Cheah, J. H., Becker, J. M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). How to specify, estimate, and validate higher-order constructs in PLS-SEM. Australasian Marketing Journal, 27(3), 197–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ausmj.2019.05.003

Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Hair, J. F. (2022). Partial least squares structural equation modeling. In Homburg, C., Klarmann, M., & Vomberg, A. (Eds.), Handbook of Market Research (pp. 1–42). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05542-8_15-2

Shmueli, G., Ray, S., Velasquez Estrada, J. M., & Chatla, S. B. (2016). The elephant in the room: Predictive performance of PLS models. Journal of Business Research, 69(10), 4552–4564. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.03.049

Shmueli, G., Sarstedt, M., Hair, J. F., Cheah, J. H., Ting, H., Vaithilingam, S., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). Predictive model assessment in PLS-SEM: Guidelines for using PLSpredict. European Journal of Marketing, 53(11), 2322–2347. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-02-2019-0189

Tomić, N., Kalinić, Z., & Todorović, V. (2023). Using the UTAUT model to analyze user intention to accept electronic payment systems in Serbia. Portuguese Economic Journal, 22(2), 251–270. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10258-022-00210-5

Uzun, A. M., Üna, E., & Kilis, S. (2024). Modeling factors associated with continuance intention to use e‑learning during and after COVID‑19. Educational Process: International Journal, 13(3), 116–138. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1447494.pdf

Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540

Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 157–178. https://doi.org/10.2307/41410412

Wang, T., Lin, C.-L., & Su, Y.-S. (2021). Continuance Intention of University Students and Online Learning during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Modified Expectation Confirmation Model Perspective. Sustainability, 13(8), 4586. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13084586

Wang, T., Wang, W., Liang, J., Nuo, M., Wen, Q., Wei, W., & Han, H. (2022). Identifying major impact factors affecting the continuance intention of mHealth: A systematic review and multi-subgroup meta-analysis. npj Digital Medicine, 5(145), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-022-00692-9

Zhao, Y., Ni, Q., & Zhou, R. (2018). What factors influence the mobile health service adoption? A meta-analysis and the moderating role of age. International Journal of Information Management, 43, 342-350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2017.08.006

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.