The Influence of Short Video Platforms on Students’ Aesthetic Literacy: A Systematic Review
Barra lateral del artículo
Contenido principal del artículo
Resumen
The rapid rise of short video platforms (SVPs) such as TikTok, Instagram Reels, and YouTube shorts has transformed digital media consumption, yet their impact on students’ aesthetic literacy remains underexplored. This study systematically reviews existing literature to examine both the benefits and challenges of SVPs in aesthetic education. SVPs can enhance digital creativity, visual storytelling, and media production skills. Besides, SVPs also contribute to passive consumption, algorithmic biases, and aesthetic conformity. The systematic review yielded important findings which highlight the need for structured educational strategies that promote active engagement, critical thinking, and creative expression. Importantly, educators play a crucial role in guiding students toward deeper aesthetic appreciation through media literacy training, student-generated content, and interactive analysis. This study also highlights the necessity of curriculum adaptation to integrate SVPs effectively. Future research should focus on longitudinal and experimental studies to assess the long-term influence of SVPs and the role of AI-driven curation in shaping artistic exposure. These insights can contribute to the growing discourse on digital aesthetics as well as educational innovation in media-rich learning environments.
Detalles del artículo
Número
Sección
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.
Referencias
Anderson, K. T., & Chen, Y. (2021). Aesthetic literacy in digital education: A conceptual framework. Computers & Education, 168, 104185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104185
Atkinson, A., Bell, P., De La Rosa, I., DeGeorge, T., Jonassen, L., Kokil, V., Lee, S., Malloy, M., Pinzon, K., Robertson, C., Curry Savage, J., Shahbaz, R., Villanueva, O., Wludyga, J., & Morris, J. (2024). Student-created videos in online STEM education: A large, interdisciplinary, randomized control study. Discover Education, 3(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-024-00283-8
Barsch, S. (2020). Does experience with digital storytelling help students to critically evaluate educational videos about history? History Education Research Journal, 17(1), 6–19. https://doi.org/10.18546/herj.17.1.06
Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2012). Flip your classroom: Reach every student in every class every day. International Society for Technology in Education.
Booth, A., Sutton, A., & Papaioannou, D. (2022). Systematic approaches to a successful literature review (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473952812
Brame, C. J. (2016). Effective educational videos: Principles and guidelines for maximizing student learning from video content. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 15(4), es6. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.16-03-0125
Braun, L. N., & Vollmer Mateus, A. M. (2024). Contemporary Ethnographic Aesthetics: The TikTok Turn. Visual Anthropology, 37(3), 195–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/08949468.2024.2330268
Brooks, C. (2024). Digital storytelling with a literary mindset. Edutopia. Retrieved from https://www.edutopia.org/article/video-storytelling-high-school/
Chen, W., Zhu, Y., & Hu, X. (2022). Ameliorated new media literacy model based on an aesthetic model. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 943955. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.943955
Chen, M., Monroy-Hernández, A., & Sra, M. (2021). SceneAR: Scene-based micro narratives for sharing and remixing in augmented reality. arXiv preprint arXiv:2108.12661. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2108.12661
Chen, X., & Zeng, H. (2023). Analysis of media's effect on people's aesthetic: A case study on TikTok. Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences, 9, 120–130. https://doi.org/10.54097/ehss.v9i.3725
Cotter, K. (2023). Algorithmic imaginings and critical digital literacy on #BookTok. New Media & Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448231206466
Do Prado, A. E., & De Campos, F. C. (2018). Análise bibliométrica 1990-2014: Inteligência competitiva. Perspectivas Em Ciência Da Informação, 23(1), 71–88.
Ewen, E. (2024, October 23). Battle of the Shorts – TikTok vs Reels vs Shorts. The Graygency. Retrieved from https://thegraygency.com/battle-of-the-shorts-tiktok-vs-reels-vs-shorts/
Fedorov, A. (2015). Semiotic and identification analysis of media texts on media education classes with students. Slavery Theory and Practice, 3, 381–396.
Hechinger Report. (2019). 114 studies on flipped classrooms show small payoff for big effort. Retrieved from https://hechingerreport.org/proof-points-114-studies-on-flipped-classrooms-show-small-payoff-for-big-effort/
Hassan, R. H. (2023). Educational vlogs: A systematic review. SAGE Open, 13(1), 215824402311524. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231152403
Hire a Writer. (2023). Gen Z and authenticity: The new wave of digital storytellers. Hire a Writer. Retrieved from https://www.hireawriter.us/social/gen-z-and-authenticity-the-new-wave-of-digital-storytellers
Herb, U., & Kaplan, A. M. (2019). Big data and digital aesthetic, arts, and cultural education. Social Science Computer Review, 37(1), 111–122. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439319888455
Jenkins, H. (2006). Confronting the challenges of participatory culture: Media education for the 21st century. The MacArthur Foundation. Retrieved from https://www.macfound.org/media/article_pdfs/jenkins_white_paper.pdf
Johns Hopkins University. (2020). Active versus passive learning - Academic support. Retrieved from https://academicsupport.jhu.edu/resources/study-aids/active-versus-passive-learning/
Kim, J., & Park, H. (2022). Selection criteria in systematic reviews: A methodological framework for educational technology research. Computers & Education, 179, 104468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104468
Kolås, L., Nordseth, H., & Ørnes, H. (2016). Interactive pedagogy in e-learning: A study of the use of interactive videos to enhance e-learning. Cogent Education, 3(1), 1252177. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2016.1252177
Li, X., Zhang, Y., & Wang, Y. (2023). Research on the mechanism of short video information interaction behavior among college students with psychological disorders. BMC Public Health, 23, 1721. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-17211-4
Li, X., Zhang, Y., & Wang, Y. (2023). The association of short-video problematic use, learning engagement, and perceived learning ineffectiveness among Chinese vocational students. Healthcare, 11(2), 161. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11020161
Linlin, W., Huang, W., & Li, Y. (2023). Research on the mechanism of short video information interaction behavior among college students with psychological disorders based on grounded theory. BMC Public Health, 23, 2256. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-17211-4
Liu, M., & Zhang, H. (2023). Systematic review methods in educational research: Advancing rigor in study selection. Educational Research Review, 38, 100474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100474
Miller, R. T., & Thompson, P. (2021). Systematic reviews in educational research: Methodology, perspectives and application. Studies in Higher Education, 46(2), 175-189. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2020.1834526
Moeller, S. (2017). Media literacy and visual culture. In The International Encyclopedia of Media Literacy (pp. 1–5). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118978238.ieml0116
Morgan, H. (2012). Creating videos can lead students to many academic benefits. Childhood Education, 88(2), 118–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/00094056.2012.662140
Nesi, J., Choukas-Bradley, S., & Prinstein, M. J. (2018). Transformation of adolescent peer relations in the social media context: Part 1—A theoretical framework and application to dyadic peer relationships. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 21(3), 267–294. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10567-018-0261-x
Noble, S. U. (2018). Algorithms of oppression: How search engines reinforce racism. New York University Press.
Oechsler, S., & Borba, M. C. (2020). Student-produced video for learning: A systematic review. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 11(6), 943–951. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1106.03
Park, M., Park, J., Baek, Y. M., & Macy, M. (2017). Cultural values and cross-cultural video consumption on YouTube. PLOS ONE, 12(5), e0177865. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0177865
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., & Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
Post University. (2022). The art and science of active learning. Retrieved from https://post.edu/blog/art-and-science-of-active-learning/
Risteska, M. (2023). Workshop on algorithmic literacy. Journal of Media Literacy Education, 15(1), 20–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.1004175
Sherman, L. E., Payton, A. A., Hernandez, L. M., Greenfield, P. M., & Dapretto, M. (2016). The power of the like in adolescence: Effects of peer influence on neural and behavioral responses to social media. Psychological Science, 27(7), 1027–1035. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797616645673
Stewart, L. A., Marshall, J. C., Wilcken, B., & Edwards, G. (2022). Systematic reviews in practice: A guide to conducting reviews according to preferred reporting items for systematic reviews. Research Synthesis Methods, 13(2), 123-135. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1526
Vural, O. F. (2013). The impact of a question-embedded video-based learning tool on e-learning. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 13(2), 1315–1323.
Wang, P., Zhao, M., & Wang, X. (2023). The association of short-video problematic use, learning engagement, and perceived learning ineffectiveness among Chinese vocational students. Healthcare, 11(2), 161. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11020161
Wohlin, C. (2014). Guidelines for snowballing in systematic literature studies and a replication in software engineering. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering, London, 13-14 May.
Yan, Y., He, Y., & Li, L. (2023). Why time flies? The role of immersion in short video usage behavior. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, Article 1127210. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1127210
Ye, J.-H., Wu, Y.-F., Nong, W., Wu, Y.-T., Ye, J.-N., & Sun, Y. (2023). The Association of Short-Video Problematic Use, Learning Engagement, and Perceived Learning Ineffectiveness among Chinese Vocational Students. Healthcare, 11(2), 161. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11020161
Zawacki-Richter, O., & Latchem, C. (2022). Conducting and reporting systematic reviews in education: A methodological perspective. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 19(1), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-022-00354-6
Zheng, L., Bhagat, K. K., Zhen, Y., & Zhang, X. (2024). Student-created videos in online STEM education. Discover Education, 3(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-024-00283-8
Zhou, H., & Yan, T. (2024). Mobile phone short video use negatively impacts attention functions: An EEG study. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 18, 1383913. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2024.1383913
Zou, S. (2022). Curating a scopic contact zone: Short video, rural performativity, and the mediatization of socio-spatial order in China. Television & New Media, 23(4), 399–417. https://doi.org/10.1177/15274764221128925
Zhang, Y., & Leung, L. (2024). Contemporary ethnographic aesthetics: The TikTok turn. Visual Anthropology, 37(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/08949468.2024.2330268
Zhang, T. (2020). A brief study on short video platform and education. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Literature, Art and Human Development (ICLAHD 2020), 543–547. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.201215.494
Zhao, Y., Wang, N., & Li, Y. (2023). Systematic review protocols in digital education: A comprehensive guide to inclusion and exclusion criteria. Review of Educational Research, 93(1), 150-172. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543221145673